http://www.highonpoker.com/2007/04/he-had-outs.html Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:22:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= http://www.highonpoker.com/2007/04/he-had-outs.html#comment-5330 Dawn Summers Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:06:00 +0000 http://69.73.186.10/~highonpo/2007/04/he-had-outs.html#comment-5330 Your bust out was SICK -- perhaps even sicker than karol's bust out where she had top two against that guy's 6 high and he went runner runner for a flush on her. He was on a craaazy run!! Your bust out was SICK — perhaps even sicker than karol’s bust out where she had top two against that guy’s 6 high and he went runner runner for a flush on her. He was on a craaazy run!!

]]> http://www.highonpoker.com/2007/04/he-had-outs.html#comment-5320 Anonymous Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:47:00 +0000 http://69.73.186.10/~highonpo/2007/04/he-had-outs.html#comment-5320 There won't be too many times where two big stacks will clash and one will be a 70% favorite, so if that's the hand you put him on, take those odds all day. There won’t be too many times where two big stacks will clash and one will be a 70% favorite, so if that’s the hand you put him on, take those odds all day.

]]> http://www.highonpoker.com/2007/04/he-had-outs.html#comment-5319 SirFWALGMan Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:38:00 +0000 http://69.73.186.10/~highonpo/2007/04/he-had-outs.html#comment-5319 You lost but you can not fold that. No way. No how. Forget it. That is losing MTT poker. Do not be an idiot. Cry on your wonderful wifey's big boobs and then man up and play the next one. That is the way of the MTT player. You lost but you can not fold that. No way. No how. Forget it. That is losing MTT poker. Do not be an idiot. Cry on your wonderful wifey’s big boobs and then man up and play the next one. That is the way of the MTT player.

]]> http://www.highonpoker.com/2007/04/he-had-outs.html#comment-5318 Alceste Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:21:00 +0000 http://69.73.186.10/~highonpo/2007/04/he-had-outs.html#comment-5318 Given how relatively tightly you had been playing, I was actually thinking about laying down the nines; but my stack was so short (I had somewhere over 2.5:1 odds to call your re-raise) that I figured the call was probably close to +EV since your range of hands would still include two overcards. Given how relatively tightly you had been playing, I was actually thinking about laying down the nines; but my stack was so short (I had somewhere over 2.5:1 odds to call your re-raise) that I figured the call was probably close to +EV since your range of hands would still include two overcards.

]]>