web analytics

High On Poker

"You Decide" Index

February 19th, 2007

fffWelcome to my “You Decide” Index, where you can peruse my many “You Decide” posts. In each post, I present a hand that I played and ask your opinion. Feel free to be honest and brutal. I can take it. I get emails whenever you comment, so feel free to leave a comment on an old post because I’ll get it. On that note, read the comments because a lot of the hand discussion between me, the readers and some fellow bloggers (most of whom are well versed in poker analysis) offer more insight than the hand narratives alone. I will update this page as needed.

Trip Report Index

February 18th, 2007

If you are a new reader of High on Poker or you’ve read the site since the beginning, you have probably come across one of my many trip reports. For the most part, the trips are to Atlantic City, a mere 2 hours from my apartment in New York City. However, I also visited Las Vegas, Seattle, and Philadelphia, ostensibly for other reasons, but ultimately because of poker. Since the trip reports seem to be a perennial favorite at HoP, I’ve compiled a list of links to my various trip reports, organized by date. I will do my best to update this list as needed. Enjoy!

Fueled Up

February 16th, 2007


I moneyed in CC‘s Thursday Bash last night…and I didn’t even play.

The night started off at 9:40 when wifey Kim fell asleep while watching a DVR’ed episode of Top Design. We are fools for reality tv contests and this one is decent enough. I like watching the social interaction and the voyeuristic elements of the shows, very similar to the reason why I enjoy some blogs, but once she dozed off, I pulled out the laptop to play some online poker.

Meanwhile, the siamese cat we are cat sitting for my buddy Jefe sulked around the apartment. How do I always end up watching cats?!

I played a quick 18 person SNG on Full Tilt for a $26 Token along with GCox. I busted pushing with a flush draw and two overs, but I should have never been in that hand in the first place. I toyed with the idea of playing another SNG, but I decided, correctly, that I wasn’t playing well, part of being rusty and part of being overanxious to play. I decided to drop in on CC’s tournament, since GCox was still in it and I wanted to see the other players.

On that note, if you are a blogger and want to get your name out more, there is no better way to do that then to play in blogger tournaments. Not only will you get to compete against some fellow bloggers, but its largely a very open and friendly group, and newbies, like DaFoundation last night, are generally welcomed, albeit with a bit of ball-busting.

I said hi to one table with CC, Katitude, Peaker and Chipper (I believe that the Poker Dwarf was him) and offered some words of encouragement to Peak. He, in turn, told me to stop playing online poker. Good advice.

I then went over to the other table in the tournament, when I saw this text in the room’s chat box:

23skidoo: I bet that Fuel doesn’t even make it to the money. Any takers?

At the time, Fuel was the chip leader with over 4500 in chips. Second place had 3600 at most, but beyond that, Fuel was way ahead of the rest of the pack. There were only 11 or 10 players left and I have a lot of respect for Fuel’s game, mostly because he has the mind for the game, not to mention the attention span, something I woefully lack, online.

All that said, I wasn’t going to take Skidoo up on his offer, because Fuel was sitting out. Now, I don’t know what I missed, but I figured that Fuel probably knocked out Skidoo, took a big chip lead, and then, for whatever reason, timed out. Now, I like me some gamble, so I was considering Skidoo’s offer when I see that Fuel had returned. Had he not returned, I couldn’t take the deal. He had a nice lead, but anyone worth their weight in poop would’ve stole his blinds once the bubble came if he was still sitting out.

Now that he was back, I wondered if Skidoo would still honor the offer, but I jumped on it nonetheless:

HighOnPokr: I’ll take that action, Skid.
23skidoo: $20?
HighOnPokr: $10

And it was done. $10. I then proceeded to watch the rest of the tournament, something I rarely do if I’m not still in the game.

Fuel’s play impressed me. He set farms like a mofo, and its something I’ll consider doing in the future. As a result, he felted someone when he made a set of 2s against pocket Kings, and someone else when he hit a set of 6s against pocket Tens. He was aggressive, but overall kept a level head and a strong amount of chips.

Four-handed, it was Fuel, GCox, CC, and one other player who now slips my mind (sorry, but my eye was on my action on Fuel and my good pal G). It looked like G would bubble, but amazingly, he made a valiant comeback from a short stack. Fuel took a beat and dropped to the short stack, but fought his way back. In the end, it was the forgotten player that busted and I did myself a happy dance. Skidoo paid up and I made $10 at CC’s Thursday Bash without even buying in. Fuel also repeated by taking 1st, two weeks in a row. Congrats to G as well, who happened to money in 4 token tournaments along with his CC cash.

And that was basically it. I turned off the comp once the bubble burst and I made my money, and watched some tv before hitting the hay. I got a bit of a poker fix, but more importantly, I got to reconnect with some of the guys I hadn’t chatted with in a while.

Until next time, make mine poker!

Ramblin’ Man

February 15th, 2007

Because I am miserable at work (nothing new, but this time due to a weird combination of being overwhelmed with work followed by an immediate dearth of work — er, dearth of work that I want to do?), you are going to be subject to one of my rambling posts. Let’s get to it with the first subject off of the top of my head.

Live poker is my bread and butter. I am 5 for 5 (wins and/or chops for 1st place) in live tournaments this year (and yet, 0 for 2 in live casino cash games), so I’m obviously anxious to play some more. The next stop on the HighOnPoker live tour is in New Jersey to play with some friends, including Matty Ebs. I’m not sure how public the game is, so I don’t want to out some of the other participants, but it should be interesting, as there will be some good players, some of which seem to think that I am, shall we say, overly loose.

I don’t know how I feel about have a reputation. On one hand, as long as I know what people think about me, I can exploit it. If I didn’t know what they thought (or didn’t know what my table image was), then I’d definitely be at a disadvantage (compared to the knowing me), so at least there is that. Do I wish that people thought I was a great player? It would be nice to recieve some recognition. But realistically speaking, whether I am a great player or not is not for someone else to decide, and quite frankly whatever skill I have is not on display at my lower stakes to earn the respect of some of my contemporaries. I guess it all goes back to my competing neuroses: My addictive personality is kept in check by my anal retentiveness. Stated otherwise, I play a shit load and think about the game constantly, but I only play with money I can afford to lose.

New topic, bankroll. My live bankroll started after I won some money playing and decided not to just spend it. Instead, I tossed it in an old velcro wallet that I never used, free from Structure, now known as Express for Men. Over time, I have let it slowly build, but if there was no cash in the house and I had a delivery coming, or if there was a special occassion, or if I wanted to buy something that I did not think should come out of wifey Kim and my “real” money, I’d dip into the poker wallet. I know it is bad for discipline and bankroll building, but if I can’t use my poker winnings to make my and, more importantly, wifey Kim’s lives more comfortable, then what is the point? After my big win at Salami last Friday, I finally broke the $2000 mark in the roll. I then proceeded to promise wifey Kim a shopping spree for Valentine’s Day, all of which would come from poker funds. When she hit $330, I started to envision a bill higher than $500, dropping me below $1500. I have to admit, I internally panicked, but after the $330, she didn’t find anything else particularly worthwhile and I arranged for the $330 to come directly from this month’s spending money (wifey Kim and I both get general spending money aside from our savings). So, I might be eating free crackers from the bistro downstairs by the end of next week, but my roll is still close to $2000. And yes, I have bankroll envy.

Speaking of shopping, I left something out of the Un-AC Trip Report. After I played poker and checked out with wifey Kim, we went of the aforementioned shopping spree. Atlantic City added gambling and casinos to recapture some of the coastal city’s heyday, but in the long run, all they got was a decent strip of hotels, gamblers, and inner-city suffering. Outside of the boardwalk and hotels, the city has always been a bit of a slum, but it looks like AC is finally changing for the better.

Last year, a new crop of stores were built a few blocks from the Boardwalk. The outdoor outlet mall, as it now exists, has a slew of new stores in some great modern buildings. Aside from this, Tropicana has extended their hotel to include the New York-esque The Quarter (okay, it is supposed to feel Cuban, but the stores are largely NY staples), and Caesars has bought and renovated a mall on the Boardwalk. All this means that AC has more to offer than just gambling, and while the gambling (and really, poker) is all that I care about, it’s still nice to see that AC is building itself up in a positive way. It’s kinda like that fuck buddy from college. All you care is that she keeps putting out, but if she happens to get a great GPA in a semester, you still feel glad for her…as long as she keeps putting out.

Speaking of AC (new topic), the Gathering is really chafing me. It has turned into exactly what I didn’t want. There were more than a few people interested early on, and I suppose that I am probably making a self-fulfilled prophecy here, but since then I haven’t heard any interest from anyone except Guin. Ironically, before Guin contacted me, I started my contingency plan and now Roose is on board for sure and Matty Ebs may join as well. This is ironic because if Roose is driving, I am not in a position to hook Guin up with a ride from NYC if he flies in from Canadia AND I already have a roommate. I hope I didn’t sound gruff to Guin, because I would sincerely like to meet the guy, but I would feel bad if he came to AC expecting something akin to Vegas only to get a living, breathing HoP Trip Report. In hindsight, Roose and I always have a great poker-filled time in AC, so I think any blogger would enjoy hanging with us, but I am a bit disappointed with the feeling that the Gathering is a flop. It may be a flop or it may not be, but the point is, I didn’t want to have to even think about it. I really just wanted to go to AC and since we have a ton of NE bloggers, I figured why not invite everyone to go down on the same weekend. Alas, looking back, I see I was setting myself up in a position that would require effort, coordination, and more than a bit of people-skills, three things that I generally lack. That said, I’m still going the weekend of March 9th to 11th, so if you are heading down there, let me know.

I think I’m running out of steam. Okay, one more. I have been toying around with buying a Nintendo Wii. I have a bit of the ole carpal tunnel from too many video games and computing in the past, so I think the Wii’s gyroscope action might be light on my fingers. Still, it definitely feels like one of those unnecessary purchases, and without a bunch of buddies around, as per the college days, I wonder if the entertainment value is as high.

Okay, I lied. One more. I’ll be heading to beautiful, sunny Buffalo, New York in April with wifey Kim while she goes to a speech/hearing conference up there. She’ll be at the conference for the entire day on a Friday, so I’ll be heading to a poker room in the nearby casinos. I went to college in Buffalo, but back then I didn’t play poker and there were no poker rooms in the sole Canadian casino anyway. Highlights will hopefully be the poker, eating at a bunch of shitty eateries in Buffalo for a little bit of college nostalgia, and dropping by the ole fraternity house. Iakaris lives up there too, but he seems like a busy mofo, so I don’t know if that would work out.

Okay, last one, I swear. I should have about $50 in my Full Tilt account now, and I just received $105 in my Stars account, although the source is, well, unknown to me. What does this mean? I have money online again, so expect me to write about losing $155 in about 2 hours time. Whatever the case, I really have finally shook the online poker bug, so I don’t expect to be returning to my old habit. At least I have that going for me.

Until next time, make mine poker!

This is True

February 15th, 2007

I received 7 very well thought out responses to my post yesterday asking which is true:

Statement A, Better players will suffer from more suckouts because they get in with the best of it more often than not.

Statement B, Better players will appear to be more lucky because they can make plays with marginal hands due to chips accumulation.

When I formulated the question in my head, I was actually emailing back and forth with DP from Wired Pairs. We were not talking about this subject specifically, but more generally about some tough situations in a cash game where he kept suffering from suckouts. I think DP has what it takes to eventually be a top player if he has the opportunity to make that leap, but at the very least he has a great aggressive style and the intelligence to think about his game critically. All that said, suffering repeated suckouts is tough and the only advice I could offer is that he was playing well and making the right decisions.

Let me backtrack for a moment and comment on some of the responses to my last post. Hoyazo was the first person to respond, and he believed that A was 100% accurate, but B could also be accurate. He correctly pointed out that B (which I had disclosed as an idea from Doyle Brunson’s Super/System) actually addressed Brunson’s playing style specifically, and his willingness to gamble after accumulating a bunch of orphaned pots in a cash game. That said, Hoy thought you could argue Statement B either way.

Gadzooks64 and Teresa, both from a blog I had never read before but plan on adding to my read list, Adventures of the Poker Sluts, both commented seperately. First, let me say, kudos on the blog name, ladies. Gadzooks pointed out that it depended on what side of the bad beat you were on. As for statement B, marginal players may think great players are lucky because they get “good hands”, and I think this is a very smart analysis. Imagine getting constantly pushed off of pots by an aggressive good player. It isn’t a big leap to see some players assume that the aggressive player keeps hitting his flops. Lord knows people have said this to me in cash games when I was really betting with air…repeatedly. Teresa agrees, but adds that Statement A is more about tournaments and B is more about cash games. This is interesting, mostly because it somewhat is opposed to what I said earlier about “getting lucky” with marginal cards when calling a shortstack’s all-in. But she makes a good point, as we have all suffered suckouts from pushing donkeys in tournaments, and Statement B is attributed to Brunson’s analysis of his NLHE play. She also adds, sort of as an addendum to Gadzooks ideas, intentional or not, that only “bad” players (and by those I assume, players who don’t think about the game in the right way) would assume that the good player in Statement B is “lucky.” I’m not 100% with you on this one, as I’ve explained my bluffing with air scenario, but its definitely true that less experienced players are more likely to fall into this type of thinking.

DBrider, from the PokerBus (and PokerOnAMac.com, former DADI sponsor and host of the Blogger iPod tournaments) believes, as most due, that Statement A is simple fact. He makes an interesting point, though, in regards to Statement B: “ood players will often get their money in from behind in situations where they either have +EV pot odds or the shot at knocking a player out with little risk. To win, they will have to get lucky, but it’s still the correct winning play….” Well said, DBrider. The issue of pot odds is one that no one else brought up, and while I didn’t envision it when I came up with Statements A and B, the concept clearly fits in there. This actually relates to Teresa’s comment that bad players are more likely to believe B. After all, they may neglect to even consider pot odds and therefore think that the player calling them down with middle pair, inside straight draw is a moron, when in fact the bettor is just not betting enough to the “moron” to fold his hand. I have been on the business end of a bitch and moan more than once when a player small bets his way into pot committing me. When I suck out, my opponent has, in the past, asked (none too politely) “WTF are you doing calling me with that!” The answer, which I usually will not share is, “You priced me in…bitch.”

TripJax seems to really sum up the overall consensus when he points out that Statement B is the more interesting of the two. He also references the section in Super/System as something he vividly remembers from the huge book. Me too, Trip. For some reason that idea by Brunson really stuck with me, likely because it is so contrary to common beliefs. I’m a contrarian at heart.

PokerWolf is one of the only people to put a qualifier on Statement B. While he acknowledges that great players will build a large stack and then take more shots at pots, he also notes that great players will also lay down those marginal hands when they don’t have the best of it. I suppose if you take into consideration pot odds, then it is true. The great players are going to lay down their marginal hands when the odds are against them, so you won’t see them hitting the river with bad cards as often…unless they were in a position to draw out comfortably. I don’t know if this was exactly what he was getting to, but its at least something I was able to extrapolate from his qualifying statement.

Finally, SIF brings up the implications of pot-size in regards to the two statements. SIF postulates that Statement A is more about big pots, and Statement B is more about small ones. I can see his point in A. Great players are not going to get all-in with the worst of it if they have to risk a deep stack. They are more likely to pick their spots instead of playing for a lot of money in a marginal situation. On the flip side, he says that B applies to small pots in very specific situations, where the great player is betting with a semi-bluff. This will make it appear that he got lucky when he was betting with air and/or he will win the pot without a showdown and appear to be getting lucky on the flop or with his hole cards. I suppose it can also apply to a pot-odds situation where the pot is small because of the weak bets (pricing in our good player with a bad hand). Whatever the case, the distinction is an interesting one.

Let me put in my final thoughts. Clearly, both statements are true depending on the situation. In a sense, they can be simultaneously true: It appears that a great player is getting very lucky because he keeps hitting flops or turns and is able to win pots without showdown (statement B), but when he does get to an all-in situation or showdown, he may suffer more suckouts because in THOSE situations, he is only willing to get his money in with the best of it, since he “knows” he isn’t pushing players off of hands. I agree largely with the commentors, but I also have one thing to add: Statement B is probably more true for loose aggressive players but Statement A can apply to loose or tight players. Aggressive players are, in my estimation, more likely to make the semi-bluffs and attempt to steal from or call all-ins from short stacks, putting him or herself in a position to look like they are “getting lucky.” Statement A applies to tighter players because they are usually in with the best of it due to their tight play; it applies to loose players because they may get called down more (eventually) due to their loose image.

I guess that is all for now. There is a lot of pontification in here, and I am glad to have been able to dip my toe in an obscure area of poker theory. If you have any further thoughts on the subject, please feel free to comment. And thanks for reading.

Until next time, make mine poker!

Which is True?

February 14th, 2007

Hey folks. Let’s have a little fun with Poker Theory. I am going to pose two statements, both of which I have read from professional poker players (although the specific sources allude me). The two statements are exactly opposite, but I would like your opinion on which is more true and why. I think the distinction between cash game vs. tournament play may affect which statement you believe is true (i.e., Statement A might be true for Tournaments, whereas Statement B might be true for cash games), so include which game you are applying the statements to when you add your 2 cents. Any other explanations on why A might be true in one situation, but B is true in another will also be greatly appreciated.

Let’s see if we can get at least 10 comments on this, not because I’m a comment whore (although that is largely true), but because I think that the answers will likely be split and I want to get an idea of how the split works out. Here we go:

Statement A
Great poker players will suffer an inordinate amount of suckouts, due to the sheer fact that they are better players and therefore tend to get their money in with the best of it.

Statement B
Great poker players will often appear to get lucky more, because as they accumulate chips, they put themselves in position to make marginal plays and “get lucky.”

There it is folks. Looking at it, I am fairly confident that Statement A will take a large lead in the polls, so to make it a bit more even, let me just suggest this about Statement B: The general concept is from Doyle Brunson’s Super/System.

Valentine’s Day…

February 14th, 2007

is for my Valentine. I love you wifey Kim. Thanks for not giving me shit for not getting you a card. Dinner is on me.

An Un-AC Trip Report

February 13th, 2007

The trip to AC this Sunday was an interesting one. Wifey Kim and I really needed some time away from our everyday lives, and a trip to Atlantic City was definitely in order. That said, it was not going to be my usual AC trip, largely due to our itinerary and our one-night stay in my adopted second hometown.

Wifey Kim had brunch to celebrate her friends birthday, as I sat on the couch and let time pass me by. When she got home on Sunday at 2:30, we had about 30 minutes before the Enterprise Rent A Car around the corner from my apartment openned. I do not truly understand how a company like Enterprise could have only one location open in all of Manhattan on a Sunday, let alone why that one location is only open from 3pm to 7pm, but the branch has always been good to me, so I kept with what was easy.

The second thing I don’t understand is why people would spend more money for a nicer rental car. For our money, wifey Kim and I would be styling in a compact Chevy Cobalt with roll-up windows and manual (i..e, not electronic) locks. Sure, it isn’t the lap of luxury, but I needed it for one purpose, to get me from Point A to Point B. I will add, however, that I can see renting a different car if you need more space or you have to impress someone (such as when I upgraded to the Infinity when I was meeting a client for the first time…who wants an attorney who drives a jalopey).

The drive started off well enough. It was 3:15 or so when we hit the road, and aside from some traffic at the outbound Holland Tunnel (from NY into NJ) and a missed exit from the NJ Turnpike to the Garden State Parkway, the ride was uneventful. I did, however, find that wearing the diaper helped avoid bathroom stops (thanks NASA!).

One thing I did notice was that the trip was definitely going to be different from my usual trips with the guys. The thing that, well, annoyed me the most was that wifey Kim did not instantly know the passenger ettiquete naturally developed between me, Roose, the Holes and bro-in-law Marc. The passenger is always to have change ready for all tolls (assuming to EZ Pass), and should have the change in an easily accessible location, lest the passenger fall asleep or be otherwise occupied. When I asked wifey Kim to put the change out, she dumped it in a cup holder that already contained a cup. But I had to just relax. After all, we guys have made the trip into an art form and wifey Kim was still on casino travel finger paint. Other than that, we got along swimmingly.

By the time we were in AC, it was only a little after 6pm. The show was going to start at 7:30, so we decided to get dinner afterwards and grab something quickly before checking in, changing, and heading to the venue, the Boardwalk Hall located centrally on the Boardwalk attached to Trump Plaza. We hit Taco Bell, where wifey Kim and I shared a meal. That girl loves Taco Bell, even though she rarely eats it, something about being healthy or some other crap. All I know is that Taco Bell was my food of choice in college, and I’d eat it almost daily.

The check-in went smooth, although we were given a room with two Queen beds for the second time in a row, because no King sized single bed rooms were ready (at 6!? What were the past guests doing in those King sized beds…on second thought, don’t tell me). Fine. Once we were in the room, wifey Kim marveled at how she loved the bathroom. I changed while she dolled up, and set up camp on the 2nd bed.

My first priority is always to get a King bed, but if we get 2 Queens, I sincerely believe that we each should get a bed. Don’t get me wrong, people, I love sleeping with my wifey, but in her sleep, she actually grows from a 5’2″ beauty to a 6’9″ starfish that is set to always find the diagonal of any bed. Consequently, almost nightly I have to wake her to ask her to move over. I’m no mathemagician, but 2 beds with 2 people is pretty easy division. Wifey Kim didn’t wholeheartedly agree, but that’s a different story altogether.

We decided to walk to the Boardwalk Hall, mostly because I mis-remembered the distance. After arriving at 7:30 exactly, a 20 minute walk in total in the freezing cold, we found our seats. The set up was like any large stadium. The stage was in the pit of the stadium pushed to the far end, so there were no seats on one side, the back of the stage. There was an area for the band members and some stairs and raised platforms, but the major centerpiece was a dance floor. It reached short of 1/2 of the entire arena floor (where minor-league hockey is played) and then was surrounded by about three rows of cocktail tables for VIP guests.

The major problem with the layout was the fact that the rest of the arena floor was left empty. As a result, you have this relatively intimate dance floor surrounded by “courtside” tables, and then nothing for about 50 feet or more. Just plain grey floor. Then, surrounding the entire arena floor are the stadium seats. The people at the top of the horseshoe are a great distance from the “action” with a ton of dead space. The reason for all of this was relatively obvious to an onlooker. The stage was only so big, and if they filled the extra space with seats, none of the people sitting would see anything anyway, since the dancefloor was raised maybe 12 inches from the regular floor. Still, all that wasted space just felt wrong.

We were seated on the right of the stage (facing it) diagonal from the stage. We were in the 4th row or so, so we were pretty much on ground level and the cameras (set up to display the show on a big screen behind the stage and two side screens) was somewhat in our way. The rest of our view was obscured by the VIP tables. We could still see some of the action, but the best way to see details was to watch the screens.

Now, keep in mind that the seats face forward onto the empty portion of the arena floor, so we had to turn our bodies as much as possible and use our necks for the rest. I didn’t have a problem, but after a while wifey Kim did. All that said, when the show started, wifey Kim lit up. It was really worth the price of admission just to see her so happy. It wasn’t a terrible show either. The “stars”, Joey Lawrence, Joey McIntyre, Drew Lachey, Lisa Rinna and Harry Hamlin, were actually very personable as they talked to the audience, and the dances were decent, although not up to the televised shows’ standards (which I have watched with wifey Kim, therefore negating the gayness of watching Dancing with the Stars). Then Joey McIntyre sang two songs from his new CD of American Standards (totally stealing Mr. Rod Stewart’s thing) and flat out sucked. He also made stupid jokes about, Oh hey, they are on sale here tonight. What a coincidence. Wakka wakka! During the intermission, wifey Kim and I chilled and chatted. With about 4 minutes left to go, though, she turns to me and asks, “Is it weird if we left?”

Hmm…I have a general rule not to stand on ceremony. I don’t care where I am at, how much it cost me, or what other people would do. If I’m not enjoying something, I leave, plain and simple. At the same time, however, I wasn’t miserable at the show and I didn’t want wifey Kim to regret leaving, so I largely left the decision up to her besides telling her that I’m cool either way, and who cares what anyone else thinks. We decided to get up and move, and then the show restarted. We stopped near the exit and found two empty seats at a higher, but better viewpoint. After the second song though, we were ready to roll. Wifey Kim found it too commercial (Joey McIntyre’s obvious desperation the key to that comment) and otherwise that the show didn’t translate well to a live show. I found it, well, convenient, since it was in AC, and satisfactory because we left early.

Evo, an chic Italian restaurant in Trump Plaza was closing, so we hit the 24 Central Cafe, the Plaza’s diner-like establishment. After, we returned back to our hotel via the Harrah’s shuttles and went up to our room.

In our room, we watched the end of the Grammy’s. Wifey Kim didn’t feel like gambling and told me that if I wanted, I could go play poker. I didn’t actually feel like it, as I was very tired and this trip was more about spending time with wifey Kim than playing. When she fell asleep, I reconsidered, but ultimately opted to set my alarm on my cell phone for 6am for an early session. I then went to the other bed to sleep.

As I lay there, I actually saw wifey Kim’s point about the two beds. I could use her company, so I joined her. About an hour later, she hit the diagonal on the bed, and rather than wake her, I retreated to the other bed. A few hours later, wifey Kim joined me in the other bed. I remember her joining me, but when I woke up, she was back on the other bed. She saw my point, as I had been hogging my previously empty bed. Score one for the guys.

6 am rolled around, and I shut off my alarm. I was too tired to play, so I went back to sleep. We awoke together a little after 9 and had breakfast in Showboat’s diner-like restaurant, the Mansion Cafe. After, wifey Kim went upstairs to shower and pack. I went to play poker for the 1 1/2 hours we had until checkout.

Ah, poker. How do I love thee? A lot.

I should mention that I was wearing my poker cargo pants and Superman (blue) t-shirt, along with my sunglasses and had my two identical but different colored Buddha card caps with me and my iPod too. There was only one 1/2 NL game going (and maybe one 2/4 Limit) in the casino due to the early hour on a Monday. The table seemed interesting enough and the players were fairly friendly and a bit loose. I decided to play tight because of the looseness…after I semi-bluffed and then river-bluffed a straight draw/mid pair. K2 called me all the way down, ignoring the obvious flush draw, straight draw and the fact that he had TPNK. Mind you, though, I am not complaining. I planned on making my money back from him later.

A kid on my left was showing me his cards a lot. He was annoyed by the K2 guy and said stuff like, “His chips are mine.” I do this too, but I follow it up. He, instead, felt like K2 was pushing him around and pushed all-in with two-pair on a board that screamed flush. K2 had the flush and the kid rebought. All the while I was making mental notes of the kid’s hands and his play, not to mention his tiltability.

My stack dwindled, after the loose player left (not K2 guy, another one). I played UTG blind to a limp and then someone raised to 12. There were a few callers when it got back to me and I called after checking my cards, A8c. I didn’t hit and folded. I won a hand with the hammer when I checked in the BB (against 5 limpers) and then made a pot-sized bet on the 442 flop. I forgot to show. Doh! I don’t remember when or how, but I actually began playing loose and poorly, dropping down to about $125 out of my initial $300 stack. I was thinking that I didn’t have enough time to make it all back, but that if I had enough time, I could do it. I also realized that I was card dead once again, continuing what had started two weeks ago at Salami (where I chopped 1st and 2nd in a tournament, without any good hands), and continued last week at Salami (where I chopped 1st through 3rd in a tournament, without any good hands). The best hand I had seen in probably 4+ sessions and in total probably 12+ hours was TT. Once again, I am not complaining, since I think complaining about luck or donkeys is for players who don’t have enough confidence in their own game or enough skill (you decide on that one). I’m just stating facts. So, it’s almost my last hand and I finally am dealt JJ. Prelop, in EP I raise from $2 to $10, which, at the time, felt too small of a bet. A bald 40-something guy who had a friendly, joking attitude (What do you call a female turtle? A Clitortoise!) raised to $30-40. It folded around to me and I only had about $100 left, total. I thought I may be behind, but I was weighing the possibilities, along with the fact that I had to leave soon. I pushed for $55 or so more and he called. The flop was all unders. I asked him if he had QQ, KK or AA. “No.” “Good because I have Jacks,” I flipped them up prematurely. “I don’t care if you see.” I didn’t. “I believed you. I have 9s.” No nine on the turn or the river (Note to dealers: Don’t take your sweet fucking time with the river, pulling it out and then looking at it, oohing and ahing before tabling it, dickwad). I doubled up and had over $200 for the first time in nearly an hour.

A new player joined the table about 45 minutes into my hour and a half run. He looked vaguely familiar, a skinny, goateed 20 something year old red-head. When I raised to $12 preflop and got four callers, I said, “Man, no one respects my raises.” (In hindsight, this is when I began to get loosey goosey…not good poker). The new kid looked to me and said, “I’ve played with you before.” He did look familiar. “I’m not sure if that is a good thing or a bad thing.” I am still not sure. We never tussled. However, this is probably a side effect of the poker uniform. Remembering me is a lot easier if I’m always wearing a Superman shirt. Thoughts?

Final hand, I’m ready to leave, UTG at 11:53am. The hand before, me, the new kid and the showing kid were chatting about how we make the most money on low suited gap connectors, like 35s or 46s. I was dealt 46o, and I had about $207, so I decided to call and fold if there were any raises. About 5 people saw the flop, all limpers. The flop was K35. We checked around. The turn was a 7, for my straight. One of the blinds bet out $10 into the $10 pot. I raised to $20. Everyone folded, but the blind called. The river was a blank. He checked and I bet $20 again. He folded and I showed my hand. I then walked off. Everyone was friendly and it was a fun time. Overall, I lost $51 (so my numbers are off somewhere in that hand). I didn’t get to play much, and I didn’t play particularly well, but I wasn’t annoyed or upset. The idea of one long session has really sunk in.

I met wifey Kim in the room and we hit the road. The rest was smooth sailing.

Missing a day from work has put me into a mental blender. So what better to do than post?

I was reading posts from Grubby and PokerWolf today. Let me first say that Wolfie has been kicking some serious blogging arse lately, and while I’m not surprised, I am delighted. I roomed with Wolf during the Bash at the Boathouse this year, and I barely knew the guy. Yet we got along really well and I could tell almost instantly that he is good people. So, nice job, Wolf. Keep it up.

Anyway, both of the posts touched on different ways to get money into (Grubby) and out of (Wolf) online poker and ways that the industry can change to make it all work. Wolf’s post really makes a great point about how the online poker world might go. He suggests that B&M casinos in the US had been working on systems to allow players to play online and use their “winnings” for free vacations to the B&M casinos (or perhaps other things as well). Players could also withdraw their “winnings” at the B&M casinos as well. Check out his post, since I am just mangling it here, and he provides much better insight.

Grubby, meanwhile, continuted his quest to find a way to deposit and found a very convenient pre-paid gift card that works well on most sites. He also mentioned that it would be great if one of the major sites would offer withdrawals in the form of pre-paid gift cards.

Now, it’s my turn. In Florida, there are Penny Arcades, which essentially are like psuedo-casinos. Mind you, there are some issues regarding their legality, but largely, the casinos, um, I mean arcades, have remained open. The arcades offer slot machines and such for pennies to play (ostensibly, but really, some machines allow you to play up to $2 per spin). Players buy prepaid cards to use at the machines and then can use the points on their cards to buy all sorts of gift certificates (and probably other items as well). For instance, my grandmother, she who taught me all I know about gambling, just sent wifey Kim and I $35 worth of Outback giftcards that she won at the arcade. They also have cards for grocery stores, Walmart/Kmart/Target, and a variety of other places. Effectively, they are not paying out money, per se, but they are paying out something almost as useful. Sure, you are locked in to spending your winnings at the store of choice, but you get to choose the store.

How could this work for online poker? Well, I don’t see why a site such as Full Tilt couldn’t offer payouts via gift cards to Amazon, BestBuy and other stores, akin to what companies like PokerSourceOnline does. I am sure that this will change some of the psychology of poker. People would be playing to earn enough gift cards for things such as big TVs at BestBuy or poker books (or non-poker books) at Amazon. That said, at least there would be some benefit to playing online…you could actually USE the money you win, as opposed to, well, letting it sit online and dreaming about the day that online poker becomes legal in the US and the government unfreezes Neteller funds. This could even allow US players to play at sites like Party against non-US players (who can still withdraw cash), by only allowing US players to withdraw via gift cards. It would go around US banking institutions, since the cards would be purchased by the sites directly and mailed or emailed (instantaneously!) to you.

So, what’s the problem? Get to it, Full Tilt.

Until next time, make mine poker!

Dancing with the Mastercard

February 12th, 2007

Rental Car for one day: $52

Enough Gasoline to Atlantic City and back: $26

Tax on comped Showboat room: $11

Tickets to see Dancing with the Stars Live with your wife: $110

Your wife telling you after the intermission that she’d seen enough and was ready to leave Dancing with the Stars: priceless.

Some things money can’t buy. For everything else, there’s poker.

Make your game nights more authentic with a new poker table from PokerChips.com.



* * *

High On Winning

If you're training to be a poker champion there's only one way to get better and that's through constant practice. Online poker makes it possible to play anytime, anywhere.

* * *

FullTiltPoker is the #1 place to Play Poker Online. Visit our Full Tilt Poker Download page and receive an exclusive Full Tilt Poker Bonus Code. If you want to Play Blackjack Online, then visit our #2 room PokerStars.com today. Get the latest PokerStars Download.


* * *
Work on your poker skills at Casino Club or face the Full Tilt pros and use the Full Tilt Poker Referenzcode . For casino action, play some blackjack at the Mr Green Casino or take advantage of the PartyCasino Bonus Code at the slot machines.
* * *
Learn to become a poker online champion using our free poker rules and poker strategy guides, written by the online poker professionals themsleves!


Poker Sites


TitanPoker.com
Poker Savvy


Play Poker Online
Play Poker Online at Full Tilt Poker
100% Signup bonus up to $600 at the fastest growing Online Poker Room.
Web Design Bournemouth Created by High Impact.
Copyright © High On Poker. All rights reserved.