<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Decide &#8211; A hand by Mr. Goss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.highonpoker.com/2006/10/i-decide-a-hand-by-mr-goss.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.highonpoker.com/2006/10/i-decide-a-hand-by-mr-goss.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:22:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drizztdj</title>
		<link>http://www.highonpoker.com/2006/10/i-decide-a-hand-by-mr-goss.html#comment-4514</link>
		<dc:creator>Drizztdj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.73.186.10/~highonpo/2006/10/i-decide-a-hand-by-mr-goss.html#comment-4514</guid>
		<description>I agree with Mark, I&#039;d get stacked on the turn, not the river which would be a check-fold for me considering the action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Mark, I&#8217;d get stacked on the turn, not the river which would be a check-fold for me considering the action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.highonpoker.com/2006/10/i-decide-a-hand-by-mr-goss.html#comment-4504</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 04:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.73.186.10/~highonpo/2006/10/i-decide-a-hand-by-mr-goss.html#comment-4504</guid>
		<description>I would have pushed with the nuts and redraw on the turn - you have more flush outs than your opponents have repeat outs. On the river you should fold or call, never reraise with the worst full house.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Limping in late position is okay. On the flop you are drawing to exactly two aces - those which give you flush redraws - so calling a raise is incorrect. The other two aces give you the nuts with zero outs, not something you want.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In omaha bottom two pair gives you protection against a repeat, it does NOT give you outs to a full house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have pushed with the nuts and redraw on the turn &#8211; you have more flush outs than your opponents have repeat outs. On the river you should fold or call, never reraise with the worst full house.</p>
<p>Limping in late position is okay. On the flop you are drawing to exactly two aces &#8211; those which give you flush redraws &#8211; so calling a raise is incorrect. The other two aces give you the nuts with zero outs, not something you want.</p>
<p>In omaha bottom two pair gives you protection against a repeat, it does NOT give you outs to a full house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.highonpoker.com/2006/10/i-decide-a-hand-by-mr-goss.html#comment-4503</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.73.186.10/~highonpo/2006/10/i-decide-a-hand-by-mr-goss.html#comment-4503</guid>
		<description>I agree that he shouldn&#039;t have even been in the hand in the first place.  Omaha is a game of the nuts, and a hand like that only stands to get you in trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that he shouldn&#8217;t have even been in the hand in the first place.  Omaha is a game of the nuts, and a hand like that only stands to get you in trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

