For those unfamiliar with the term, ring rust refers to boxers who have been out of the ring for too long, such that they are rusty and need training to get back into fighting shape. For poker players, especially post Black Friday, it seems that ring rust has been a common theme. After all, we have gone from playing poker online daily to fitting in a live game when we can.
This post, though is not about my ring rust. Rather, it is about the possibility that ring rust is a fiction for some poker players, and a harmful one at that.
Consider this: I have played poker regularly for several years, on a near-daily basis. I stopped playing regularly when Black Friday happened. Now, when I play, it is rare and I feel like I am not playing as well. Certainly, my results have plateaued. Does this mean I have ring rust?
Possibly. It would be easy to argue that I am not playing well because I am rusty. My concern is that this belief, that poker must be played often to remain at a high level, is a cop out. Is it really that I am rusty from not playing a lot? Or am I playing poorly and using my lack of play as an excuse? Even more scary, am I playing well and suffering variance, but blaming it on ring rust?
If this was 2009, I would consider the problem to be ring rust and spend more time playing until I felt back in the swing of things. Since it is 2012, I am no longer able to play online poker, so my options are much more limited. I could, potentially, increase my hours at the local BatCave Club, or try to attend the homegames I have been getting emails about for months. But both of those actions take significant time, money and planning that I do not have. So do I give up on poker?
And therein lies my dilemma. If I believe that ring rust is the reason for my plateaued results, then the answer is for me to stop playing poker altogether, since there is no way for me to work through my ring rust on a regular basis. Quitting poker, however, is just unacceptable. Therefore, I have committed myself to a different theory.
Ring rust is just an excuse for playing poorly. I don’t need to play often to work through ring rust; I just need to be extra vigilant when I do play. In some ways, its just changing a label. Instead of saying “ring rust” I say “poor play”. The difference, to me at least, is that when I say “ring rust” I feel like I am blaming the results on the circumstances that surround me. When I saw “poor play” the responsibility is mine.
For me, the poor play most often comes from forcing action, which is surely a byproduct of infrequent play. Since I do not get to play often, when I do, I want to get the action started quickly. But I tended to have the same problem when I arrived late to a game; I’d try to play catch up. Or after a few losing sessions, I’d try to win back my money quickly on the next session. Those aren’t due to ring rust. Nope, that’s just plain poor play. I don’t need to fix my ring rust. I need to fix my play.
And so, I encourage all of you to not let ring rust get in the way of your poker. It is just an excuse. Ring rust is just another word for bad play, and any bad play should be ferreted out, whether it be due to infrequent play or other shortcomings.
But hey, that’s just my 2 cents.
Until next time, make mine poker!